Adam Megacz
2004-04-19 20:44:33 UTC
Please read my previous email ("grandparents") before this one.
What follows is a gross violation of netiquette, but I'm going to do
absolutely will not tolerate you using it as a threat, even if it is a
rather pathetic threat. It's astoundingly unprofessional. I've put
up with a whole lot of attitude from you compared with very little
concrete contribution. Right now the cost/benefit analysis of your
presence here is way, way, way in the red.
Charlie, I have similar problems with you, but less severe. Lately
you've been doing little but sowing discontent around here. You
complain incessantly and exhibit absolutely no willingness to research
the problems you gripe about before posting them (and then you get
angry when I don't have time to repsond to 10+ posts a day from one
person). I've read over the widget code in detail, and to be honest
there's barely anything there, and what is there has a lot of
problems. When I point out those problems, you take it very
personally. I'm very concerned at this point that you're trying to
impose your design on the widget library simply by "being there first"
rather than by coming up with the best design.
I have to ask both of you to take a two week vacation from the Ibex
mailing lists. Feel free to post a parting comment or two; I owe it
to you to give you the last word; I won't retort. But then I must ask
you both to refrain from posting until May 1st. If you need to
communicate with other developers (or groups thereof), please do so
off-list.
- a
What follows is a gross violation of netiquette, but I'm going to do
We are days if not hours away from forking. Not a soft fork, not a
fork that tries to get its changes pushed to core.ibex.org. A great
big, hard to reverse, fork. Separate servers, separate lists, etc.
Suffice it to say that I would be very surprised if there were fewer
than 5 active contributors to the fork (on day one), and equally
surprised if there was more than one remaining contributor (you) to
the ibex branded version.
Tupshin, I don't mind you forking the project one bit. But Ifork that tries to get its changes pushed to core.ibex.org. A great
big, hard to reverse, fork. Separate servers, separate lists, etc.
Suffice it to say that I would be very surprised if there were fewer
than 5 active contributors to the fork (on day one), and equally
surprised if there was more than one remaining contributor (you) to
the ibex branded version.
absolutely will not tolerate you using it as a threat, even if it is a
rather pathetic threat. It's astoundingly unprofessional. I've put
up with a whole lot of attitude from you compared with very little
concrete contribution. Right now the cost/benefit analysis of your
presence here is way, way, way in the red.
Charlie, I have similar problems with you, but less severe. Lately
you've been doing little but sowing discontent around here. You
complain incessantly and exhibit absolutely no willingness to research
the problems you gripe about before posting them (and then you get
angry when I don't have time to repsond to 10+ posts a day from one
person). I've read over the widget code in detail, and to be honest
there's barely anything there, and what is there has a lot of
problems. When I point out those problems, you take it very
personally. I'm very concerned at this point that you're trying to
impose your design on the widget library simply by "being there first"
rather than by coming up with the best design.
I have to ask both of you to take a two week vacation from the Ibex
mailing lists. Feel free to post a parting comment or two; I owe it
to you to give you the last word; I won't retort. But then I must ask
you both to refrain from posting until May 1st. If you need to
communicate with other developers (or groups thereof), please do so
off-list.
- a