To tile or not to tile

[Charles Goodwin]

Just perusing the reference... tiling is gone! Or, more specifically,
un-tiling is gone!

How do you now prevent an image from tiling, instead making it stretch
to fill the box that contains it? Before it would be done by setting
tile=false, but that's no longer there.

I would assume you might use 'transform' but that is currently
unsupported by the core.

Any clues? Or ideas?

[Adam Megacz]

Post by Charles Goodwin
How do you now prevent an image from tiling,

Set (or leave) the box's size the same as the image's size

Post by Charles Goodwin
instead making it stretch to fill the box that contains it?

You do this with vector transforms, which don't exist yet. So you'll
have to live without it for now.

[Charles Goodwin]

Post by Adam Megacz

Post by Charles Goodwin
How do you now prevent an image from tiling,

Set (or leave) the box's size the same as the image's size

Post by Charles Goodwin
instead making it stretch to fill the box that contains it?

You do this with vector transforms, which don't exist yet. So you'll
have to live without it for now.

Any idea when transforms will be implemented? Even basic ones?

[Adam Megacz]

ASAP. But there are more important things right now.

- a

Post by Charles Goodwin

Post by Adam Megacz

Post by Charles Goodwin
How do you now prevent an image from tiling,

Set (or leave) the box's size the same as the image's size

Post by Charles Goodwin
instead making it stretch to fill the box that contains it?

You do this with vector transforms, which don't exist yet. So you'll
have to live without it for now.

Any idea when transforms will be implemented? Even basic ones?
--
- Charlie
_______________________________________________
core mailing list
http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/core

[Charles Goodwin]

ASAP. But there are more important things [than transforms] right now.

Yes, like unpacked boxes. Can't have transforms without them working.

[Adam Megacz]

SUBMIT A BUG ALREADY

I have no idea what you're talking about.

- a

Post by Charles Goodwin

ASAP. But there are more important things [than transforms] right now.

Yes, like unpacked boxes. Can't have transforms without them working.
--
- Charlie
_______________________________________________
core mailing list
http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/core

[Charles Goodwin]

Post by Adam Megacz
SUBMIT A BUG ALREADY
I have no idea what you're talking about.

At last you respond.

I did submit a bug. You closed it. I reopened it. You closed it.

Try actually using [unpacked boxes in] Ibex and you'll know what I'm
talking about. Unless used on their own in a parent box bigger than
them, they are utterly broken. Period.

[Charles Goodwin]

Ignore me. I'm tired and grumpy for various reasons, and being
facetious because of it.

Will sort out test cases on the 'morrow. Sorry 'bout this crap...

Post by Charles Goodwin

Post by Adam Megacz
SUBMIT A BUG ALREADY
I have no idea what you're talking about.

At last you respond.
I did submit a bug. You closed it. I reopened it. You closed it.
Try actually using [unpacked boxes in] Ibex and you'll know what I'm
talking about. Unless used on their own in a parent box bigger than
them, they are utterly broken. Period.